Are you an active woman? An inactive sloth? A laid-back housecat? A moderately hyperactive dog who kind of pees a little when life gets too exciting? A bird who realized the dryer vent led to someplace warm but did not anticipate being trapped in the house at the end of that journey and who is now frantically bouncing off the windows in an attempt to escape?
Well, the good news is, I have a cookbook for exactly one of those categories. (Hint: It's not the bird.)
Yep, it's The Active Woman's Cookbook (Avon/ Ideals, 1980). Damn. I shouldn't have built the introduction up so much now that you're all trying to imagine what a hyperactive dog cookbook might look like.
Actually, I'm not entirely sure it's a cookbook for active women either, based on the cover. It's apparently a cookbook for people who enjoy arranging their produce, dessert, and salad on a nondescript counter, which doesn't really seem like a hobby for anyone with a particularly active life.
The recipes hint that "active" might be a euphemism anyway. Maybe it means "too busy to really care about what most people consider to be a 'hero' sandwich."
I don't know anyone whose favorite is baked beans, hot dogs, and cheese dumped into a half-loaf of Vienna bread. (I love the specification of a half loaf! On the one hand, the goopy filling is more likely to spill out, but still, only half a loaf means you're left with less bread soaking up low-grade Beanie Weenies.)
Or maybe "active" means "so busy they're willing to cook meat in the microwave rather than taking a few extra minutes to actually brown it on the stove."
Of course, drowning the meatballs in onion, tomato soup, brown sugar, and pineapple chunks pretty much guarantees they'll be gloppy and sickeningly sweet anyway, so the microwaving won't really matter in the greater scheme of things.
Maybe that sickening sweetness is the key-- "Active" people need to be filled up with sugar so they can keep buzzing around.
I love how the chicken recipe specified seedless grapes but said nothing about if the cherries should be pitted. Running into a grape seed is way less jarring than running into a cherry pit. Even back then diet foods were just regular foods with rediculously small serving sizes.
ReplyDeleteThat's true! A cherry pit could be dental disaster.
DeleteThe serving size trick always works because people seem not to want to believe that portion size directly correlates with calories. I've read research about how people trick themselves into believing that calorie count can't really double if they eat twice as much of something.
They're diet coookies because cranberries and coconut are an excellent source of something.
ReplyDeleteI'm pretty sure the word is "calories," but we'll call it "energy" so people will think the cookies will make them feel like going mountain climbing or some shit.
Delete